Don't worry, this isn't about my life. Although I am still somewhat saddened by the FHS fiasco, and worried about the state of our bank account, my spirits are on the rise. Today the wife and I went to
It turns out that life is still okay.
Unless you're Pulitzer-Prize-winning Cormac McCarthy, in which case it would appear that everything is not okay. I just finished reading The Road, which chronicles the life of a father and son who are trying to survive in a post-apocalyptic
Stylistically, McCarthy's writing is Hemingwayesque, sparse and economic. He doesn't use proper nouns, only pronouns (which at time is confusing), and often uses fragments. Also, between each paragraph is a larger than usual space, which seems like an insignificant detail, but it isn't. It creates a disjointed feeling, as if the story is told only in sporadic bursts of prose, which ultimately accents the bleakness or barrenness of the story.
Here is an example of his writing:
He walked out in the gray light and stood and he saw for a brief moment the absolute truth of the world. The cold relentless circling of the intestate earth. Darkness implacable. The blind dogs of the sun in their running. The crushing black vacuum of the universe. And somewhere two hunted animals trembling like ground foxes in their cover [A reference to him and his son]. Borrowed time and borrowed world and borrowed eyes with which to sorrow it.
This example is telling of his tone and of his writing style, but not of his subject. This was one of the very few times that the writing strayed from relating simply the sparse details of their daily existence.
Ultimately, I'm unsure of what to think about this book. Certainly it was memorable and interesting, but it's not clear that it was good. It was interesting much in the way that 28 Days Later is interesting. The post-apocalyptic world is intriguing, as is the murderous environment that they protagonists must survive in, and I found myself agreeing, "Yes, that would be what would happen." The story is gripping, and I turned pages quickly, wanting to know what would happen next. But was it Good? Will it last within the canon of remarkable Literature?
Here my issue lies with the plot. There was none. The novel and its characters meandered from day to day, without any real purpose except to live another day: they wake, they walk a few miles, then sleep; they starve for a while, then find food; they are in danger, then they escape. The story drones on much as the lives of the people within this blighted land. All there is is the road: no meaning, just movement. And perhaps in that sense the plot, or lack thereof, does tie in with the effect that the novel creates as a whole, and so is pardonable.
Despite the bleakness of the novel's outlook, though, there are faint hints of something that resembles hope. It is so overwhelmed by the dominant presence of gloom and doom that it is almost non-existant, but it is there. I just wanted to mention that to explain the second half of this entry's title.
In the end, I think that McCarthy does have the abilities of a great writer, but those abilities did not all coalesce in this novel into something great, or something lasting. The seeds are there, but they have not yet come to fruition.
Still, it was worth the read.
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
A Bleak Persistence , or Hope Amidst Futility
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Only someone as hopeful as you are could read this book and still be afloat.
I find myself wondering if the lack of plot lies in the authors' overall belief that their is no plot in life. Sounds like yet another cry of "meaningless, meaningless." Of course, there is no way for me to know if the author really is an existentialist, but I don't know if you can write something like that if you aren't.
how does it end?
I try not to spoil endings on my blog, so I'll tell you next time I see you.
Post a Comment